🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.